Today, we’ve got two great time-tracking apps before us - Timeero & ClockShark. These two modern SaaS solutions are both excellent in delivering what they claim they do - keeping track of your employees on the field and helping you get things done more efficiently.
Even though the apps may look pretty much the same to an inexperienced eye, you must pay attention to some subtle and less subtle differences when picking the right GPS time-tracking software for your business.
We’ve compared all crucial features in this review, including screenshots, pricing, integrations, similarities, and main differences.
So, let's move on to the central part of our Timeero vs. ClockShark review and compare the main features.
Want to Track Your Employees Exact Times, Locations, and Mileage?
ClockShark vs. Timeero Comparison: Key Features Overview
As the core feature of both software solutions, mobile time tracking is the place to start with our ClockShark vs. Timeero Comparison.
Both apps offer similar time clock and time tracking options that can be used both on iOS and Android mobile devices and Windows and Mac desktops using the cloud-based web app.
Besides clocking in and out, both apps allow you to record the employee's location during their punches.
Timeero’s time-tracking tool can be used as an individual employee time clock or a Kiosk Terminal app on iPad devices. When used on Kiosk devices, the app has a facial recognition capability, helping you prevent buddy punching time theft schemes.
As Timeero, ClockShark also captures employees’ locations when they clock in and out, take a break, or come back from one. ClockShark also offers the possibility to use the app as Kiosk installed on a tablet or a smartphone with a biometric facial recognition feature.
Basically, these mobile applications offer similar options - besides clocking in and out, you can add a note or a photo and start or end a break. Both apps allow punches in areas where the signal is off and synchronize data afterward.
Regarding the time clock app, ClockShark offers CrewClock, a feature that could be useful when in hassle. Using this option, the manager can clock in and out their entire crew or send them to break. If you want to know how the shift went regarding a certain matter, the app also allows you to set Clock Out questions for your employees' replies.
Both tools streamline and simplify the timesheet creation and approval process, as the timesheets are created as soon as clock-in happens. In both apps, you can set who can access, edit or approve timesheet entries and see the history of edits.
There is one practical difference between Timeero and ClockShark regarding timesheet management that can complicate the work of managers and supervisors.
Let’s say an employee forgets to clock in for their shift and does so later during the day. Making edits while the employee is on the clock is impossible with ClockShark. The manager must make mental or physical notes to make the changes risking forgetting all about it themselves. It may seem minor, but it can be quite disturbing. In Timeero, you can make such changes without disturbing the workflow.
There is yet another difference when it comes to logging breaks. While both tracking systems support breaks, ClockShark doesn’t let you create custom breaks.
While in ClockShark, you can define a single break and duration, Timeero lets’ you create custom breaks and specify whether they are paid or unpaid.
This is a must-have in states with strict legislation, but also a valuable addition to tracking breaks and ensuring your staff is both well-rested and accountable. As the rules are the most stringent in Califonia, Timeero came up with the California Breaks Tracker.
So, let us summarize ClockShark vs. Timeero differences in time tracking:
ClockShark has handy add-ons to the time clock, such as the CrewClock feature and Clock Out Questions.
Timeero lets you edit time cards while the employee is still on the clock, without any workflow interruption.
Timeero lets you create custom breaks and stay compliant with regulations.It also offers California Breaks tracking feature.
Most businesses with remote teams choose GPS location tracking to keep track of and manage their field employees. Timeero and ClockShark have GPS capability and keep track of employees’ whereabouts, as we’ve mentioned above.
So, we’ve decided to test the GPS capability using the mobile apps simultaneously for an hour and a half while in the field.
At first glance, everything seems fine - there is a clock-in and clock-out location on the map, and it shows that I’ve moved and changed locations during these 90 minutes.
Except, when I took a second look - this was not my route.
Let’s see what Timeero has to say.
Now, that’s more like it.
Besides GPS data, it collects when employee clocks in or out, leaves for a break or comes back from one; ClockShark gathers GPS points several times per hour, logging locations in approximately 15 minutes.
So I suppose ClockShark filled the gaps between my clock in and out locations and suggested the shortest route to present.
Timeero monitored and presented my entire actual route.
Due to the much higher frequency of gathering GPS data, I could choose whichever breadcrumb and see my location with the time stamp and speed.
So, when it comes to GPS tracking, that’s a vast Timeero vs. ClockShark difference, which could be crucial for businesses that want to improve employee attendance and the accountability of their team members.
The way things are with ClockShark now, it does not entirely represent the situation at the field; it just gives glimpses.
Differences in GPS tracking:
Timeero gathers data more frequently, so tracking locations is near real-time. It provides more precise and detailed insight into the whereabouts of your crew during shifts.
Who’s Woking (Now)
Both apps offer a real-time dashboard view of your available crew. You can see their whereabouts, the time they’ve clocked in, and which job or task they are clocked into.
The benefits of this feature are pretty straightforward for anyone in field services and workforce management.
As both apps similarly present similar data, there is no need to get into more details.
Both ClockShark and Timeero provide geofencing. This means the apps let you set a perimeter, create a virtual border around a particular location, and define specific actions when entering or leaving the zone.
In both apps, you can create a geofenced area when creating a job and use geofencing to send clock-in and out reminders to your employees when they enter or leave the geofenced zone. Both Timeero and ClockShark have ways to alert you when an employee clocks in or out of the bounds of virtual boundaries.
ClockShark vs. Timeero differences regarding geofencing:
One of the major differences is that in ClockShark, you can’t restrict an employee from logging into a geofenced job when out of bounds.
When offsite, they are still allowed to clock in.
In Timeero, you can make that restriction for an employee - they won’t be able to punch their hours unless onsite. Again, this difference may not seem crucial, but it’s proven quite important in the experience of Timeero’s customers.
Segmented tracking is a feature unique to Timeero, offering a data overview you won’t get anywhere else.
This feature shows you all the locations and jobs your employee visited during the day, how much time they’ve spent there, and the time and distance they’ve spent traveling.
All this, with a hands-off approach: a single clock-in and clock-out in the app grants you a complete overview of your employee’s day at a glance.
Mileage tracking is a great feature only Timeero provides. It’s crucial for businesses with field employees that travel from one location to another and use their own or company’s vehicles for the trip.
Timeero keeps track of routes employees take during travel, speed, and mileage. Businesses can use this data to streamline the entire mileage reimbursement process and make it more accurate. In addition, they will improve mileage accountability, so they can stop paying for long and scenic routes and cut down their mileage expenses.
When their scheduled job includes address details, Timeero can suggest the shortest route to the destination, saving employee time and company money.
Timeero vs. ClockShark Differences Regarding Mileage Tracking:
ClockShark doesn’t track mileage.
We will continue our Timeero vs. ClockShark comparison with a brief overview of both solutions' employee scheduling features.
Basically, scheduling with both apps is straightforward. It lets you create a single or a repeating shift for single or multiple employees or use the drag-and-drop option to reschedule a shift without a hassle.
You can color code jobs in both applications to give you a better visual overview of what’s everyone scheduled for.
Both apps will show PTO days in the schedule once approved in the app and remind you of scheduling conflicts, reducing the odds of assigning a job to an unavailable employee.
ClockShark vs. Timeero Differences Regarding Scheduling
When you’ve done creating the schedule or changing a shift, and you publish it, Timeero will automatically notify employees.
On the other hand, in ClockShark, after you’ve created a shift, you have to choose to notify those concerned manually - the app won’t do it automatically.
Another significant difference between Timeero and ClockShark is that Timeero gives you the option to let your employees decide whether they will accept or decline the shift, preventing possible complications.
Both Timeero and ClockShark provide vast reporting options for various purposes.
In ClockShark, you can generate Quick Summary Reports that give you an overview of labor, summarized by employee, customer, job, or task.
Besides Quick Summary Reports, you can create more detailed:
Job & Task reports
Time tracking reports
Quotes and Invoices Reports
In Timeero, besides employees timesheets that are easily available for approval in Time & Mileage Menu, you can run customized reports by
Reports on users or a group
Reports by job
Reports by Date Range
Scheduled via Hours Worked
Reports by Mileage
Daily flat rate by total (total labor costs)
Timeero vs. ClockShark Reporting Differences:
ClockShark lets you run reports on invoices and quotes and some financial reports. On the other side, in Timeero, you can run mileage reports and Scheduled vs. Hours Worked. Other than that, there are no substantial differences.
Quotes and Invoices
Unlike Timeero, ClockShark lets you create quotes and invoices from the app, discuss them with your coworkers, and email them directly to customers.
ClockShark also has some basic CRM functionality, letting you keep data on your customers and everything related to them at one centralized location. Timeero provides similar functionality.
Timeero vs. ClockShark difference regarding quotes and invoices:
ClockShark lets you create invoices and quotes in-app. In Timeero, you can use reports to get the data you need for invoicing. However, there is no quote option.
To streamline your workflow, ClockShark offers integrations with Zapier and particular payroll and accounting software.
Both Timeero and ClockShark integrate with ADP Workforce Now®, QuickBooks Online, and Desktop, RUN Powered by ADP®, Xero, Paychex, Gusto, and Zapier.
Differences: Besides the app we’ve mentioned, ClockShark also connects to ADP Workforce Now® Next Generation, MYOBAccount Right, and Sage 100. Timeero, on the other hand, also connects to Rippling and Viventium.
However, unlike ClockShark, Timeero supports open API, which opens up endless possibilities regarding connecting with other apps.
Furthermore, in Timeero, you can use multiple integrations simultaneously; in ClockShark, this is impossible.
ClockShark vs. Timeero: User Reviews
Browsing through user reviewson G2 and other listing sites has shown that the customers are mostly satisfied with these two GPS tracking solutions. They seem to favor the ease of setup and use and the quality of the customer support both apps provide.
So, let us move on to another question that is probably on top of your mind - what can you get out of these two, and for what price?
Timeero Pricing is straightforward, with no monthly fees, just the monthly costs per user. There are four pricing packages:
Basic: $4/mo per user
Pro: $8/mo per user
Premium: $11/mo per user
Enterprise: For organizations with over 250 users. Contact the sales team for a customized plan.
ClockShark pricing is a bit more complex. The price consists of the monthly base fee for one admin and the monthly costs per user. This type of pricing is not the best for small businesses, as they get to pay the same flat base fee, no matter the number of users. There are two pricing packages, Standard and Pro.
Standard: $40 monthly fee + $8/mo per user
Pro: $60 monthly base fee + $10/mo per user
To make it easier for you to compare features and pricing packages, we made a brief overview.
As we can see, both Timeero and ClockShark offer a free 14-day trialto check the app and see how they fit your business needs.
Timeero or ClockShark? Which One Should I Choose for My Business?
By now, you probably know which processes you want to streamline with the GPS tracker app. In our comparison, we’ve tried to compare and stress the differences between these two apps.
But if you want to learn more about each of these apps, you can read our comprehensive ClockShark and Timeero reviews.
If you’re looking for more precise and reliable tracking, with route and mileage monitoring, along with all other features these two apps share - Timeero is your best shot.
Timeero vs. ClockShark FAQ
Does Clockshark track mileage?
Although ClockShark comes with GPS tracking, it doesn’t track mileage.
Andjelka is a sociologist turned digital marketer. She specializes in creating content for SaaS and software companies. When she’s not researching the most effective employee management techniques, Andjelka loves cooking, reading, and fighting for human rights.